I'd be curious about copyright issues though, as it's licensed on Github <https://github.com/acheong08/ChatGPT/blob/main/LICENSE>. It may indeed be infringing copyright, since he may require attribution. However, I agree with The Cunctator that the community won't do anything about it.
Incidentally, I'm a little worried that he might grab broken content that wasn't rolled back. After all - the current artificial intelligence can not reach the level of human thinking Sincerely, ZhaoFJx _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Anders Wennersten <[email protected]> 于2022年12月19日周一 08:52写道： > I think we should not underestimate what this could evolve into. We > thrived because our readers find us "good enough" when it comes to finding > facts, not the ultimate source. > > And the software learns by reading, and can (and have done so) Wikipedia, > Wikidata etc and represent our data in its own syntax och present it in a > way so it is not a direct copy. Perhaps data will be a bit delayed to the > actual content in Wikipedia, but so what - good enough? > > Anders > > Den 2022-12-19 kl. 14:26, skrev Gnangarra: > > AI simply cant descriminate between good research and faked research, for > any outcome it must provide all of its sources whether they are from > Wikipedia, Wikidata, WikiCommons, WikiSource or some other place. > Otherwise it will answer yes to some asking if the world is flat because > it'll seek out that answer and find all the nonsense that has been produced. > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 06:02, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:55 AM Anders Wennersten >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ChatGPT is now making headlines more or less every day and I perceive >> > them to try to position themself av the "next" google. >> >> I suspect OpenAI will continue to focus on generative applications >> (images, code, text for purposes such as copywriting, eventually >> music/video) and won't attempt to compete with Google directly, but >> we'll see. Currently GPT-3.5 (which ChatGPT is based on) is very prone >> to generating nonsensical answers, citations to works that don't >> exist, etc. But it is pretty cool if you keep its limitations in >> mind--for example, it's quite good at bootstrapping small scripts in >> various programming languages (with mistakes and idiosyncrasies). >> >> Google has one of the largest AI research programs on the planet, they >> just are extremely conservative about letting anyone try their models >> (due to reputational concerns, e.g., that generative AI will spit out >> racist output within about 30 seconds of people poking its >> guardrails). This blog post from September is instructive about the >> direction they're taking with what's called retrieval-augmented >> generation; see the paper linked from the post for details: >> >> https://www.deepmind.com/blog/building-safer-dialogue-agents (DeepMind >> is part of Google) >> >> That is likely to yield significantly more accurate answers than what >> ChatGPT is doing, and is difficult to replicate for folks like OpenAI >> without being dependent on the search APIs of big search companies. >> It's worth noting that Google has also started to incorporate language >> model tooling into how it's presenting search results (e.g., >> summarizing or highlighting different parts of a website to make the >> result snippet more useful). >> >> A retrieval-augmented approach that leverages Wikidata could IMO be >> quite powerful and could be a useful research program for Wikimedia to >> pursue, be it independently or in partnership with others. The >> resulting technology should of course be fully open source. >> >> Querying Wikidata via SPARQL is currently still a bit of wizardry (and >> the query builder is extremely limited). To pick a completely random >> example not at all inspired by current events, if I wanted to see a >> list of journalists with Mastodon accounts & a picture, I currently >> have to do this: >> >> SELECT DISTINCT ?personLabel ?mastodonName ?pic >> WHERE { >> ?person wdt:P4033 ?mastodonName ; >> wdt:P106 ?occupation . >> OPTIONAL { ?person wdt:P18 ?pic . } >> ?occupation wdt:P279* wd:Q1930187 . >> SERVICE wikibase:label { >> bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" >> } >> } >> >> Make a small mistake (a curly brace missing) and you'll get a red >> error message. Forgot the * after wdt:P279? A different response set >> in ways that are difficult to spot or reason about. >> >> Why can't I type "list of journalists with their picture and Mastodon >> account" as a natural language query? (You can try it in ChatGPT and >> it'll get you started, but it'll generate nonsense P/Q numbers.) If >> such queries could be produced reliably, it could be a very useful >> tool for readers as well. >> >> Warmly, >> Erik >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines >> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >> Public archives at >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/YYTLJVCDSYITUKNA2DJSK5SSR3AZ3B5F/ >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > > > -- > Boodarwun > Gnangarra > 'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardoon ngalang Nyungar > koortaboodjar' > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/CVXPECMNLGBGIQYP2DI7IRJVLUNNOF6B/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines > at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HKAPIBPSXAETLTFQFQDPDCSGCFWDCXAQ/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/ALV3QLKTB7RWCCR5W4HNDA4ZDG5ARRDC/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/ZRVVJ3WVSB2VKRD5MQYILZYHLVZBMSQO/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
