That's OK. I have much bigger platforms. My apologies for the
ultra-offensive reference to...flatulence.

Best,

Dan

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:03 PM Jackie <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I hear that you are upset by the suggestion and likely implementation of a
> Universal Code of Conduct. I also hear that you feel like this is a
> WMF-driven project. I cannot change your opinion about the UCoC, but I can
> say your feelings about this being a WMF-driven project are untrue. It
> doesn't matter how strongly you feel this, it's actually many groups of
> people working together. It was determined as a major need during
> discussions I had as part of the Community Health Working Group and I am
> glad to see this moving forward.
>
> I am glad you feel comfortable expressing yourself and your feelings about
> the UCoC. I also would like to say the way in which people express
> themselves and mask insults as "lively discussion" is a huge reason why we
> need a UCoC. To that point, I agree with Isaac and would suggest you share
> in a (collegiate) conversation on the Meta talk page. I just cannot take
> you seriously with the language you used in your email. I, however, would
> love to take your comments seriously and have you engage in a good-faith
> discussion about the UCoC.
>
> Our roles in the discussion should consider not only our needs as
> individuals but the needs of the broader communities. To dismiss the UCoC
> is failing to recognize privilege and power structures and their effect on
> people in and outside of the Wikimedia community.
>
> Best,
>
> Jackie
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:42 PM Isaac Olatunde <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > You are allowed to offer an opinion but I Honestly think that's better
> and
> > more useful on the Draft talk page.
> >
> > That being said, by "effective vote or representation in the
> proceedings",
> > you probably expected a different model where different language
> > Wikip(m)edia community would be represented or vote on weather to have a
> > UCoC.
> >
> > The current model isn't bad.  I do think we should review the draft and
> if
> > there are specific wording we disagree with, we can either suggest
> > improvement or removal altogether. I honestly think we need to help and
> > support the drafting committee at this stage.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Isaac
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, 19:25 Dan Szymborski, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also perfectly free to express to the IRS that I'd really like to
> > get a
> > > $10 million check from them at tax time. The ability to offer an
> opinion
> > on
> > > proceedings with no effective vote or representation in the proceedings
> > is
> > > about as good as a fart in the wind. I'd prefer the WMF keep its
> > flatulence
> > > to itself.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:17 PM Isaac Olatunde <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On the contrary, I do not think this is an imposition by the Board or
> > WMF
> > > > as we are allowed to comment on the draft, and suggest improvement.
> > > >
> > > > I have been following the process closely and I do not see anything
> > that
> > > > looks like an "imposition"
> > > >
> > > > The Universal Code of Conduct is not a substitute to the existing
> > policy
> > > or
> > > > guidelines but a behavioural guidelines expected of users in any
> > > Wikimedia
> > > > project.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Isaac
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, 16:11 Dan Szymborski, <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As this is being explicitly imposed by the board from above without
> > > > > community approval, participating in any way is ethically unsound.
> > > Doubly
> > > > > so without a board election preceding this as the WMF has
> arbitrarily
> > > > > denied communities the right, as manifested in the election of the
> > > > > community seats, to voice their opinions of actions that WMF has
> > taken
> > > > over
> > > > > the last 18 months. A collaborative process is a collaborative
> > process
> > > > when
> > > > > it's actually a collaborative process, not just when it's called
> one.
> > > > >
> > > > > The best use of time at this point is to organize the communities
> to
> > > use
> > > > > every means at its disposal to resist such an imposition.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:18 PM Patrick Earley <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello, everyone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We are excited to share a draft of the Universal Code of Conduct
> > > > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct>,
> which
> > > the
> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees called for earlier this
> year
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/May_2020_-_Board_of_Trustees_on_Healthy_Community_Culture,_Inclusivity,_and_Safe_Spaces
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > for your review and feedback. The discussion will be open until
> > > October
> > > > > 6,
> > > > > > 2020.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The UCoC Drafting Committee
> > > > > > <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Drafting_committee
> > > > > > >wants
> > > > > > to learn which parts of the draft would present challenges for
> you
> > or
> > > > > your
> > > > > > work. What is missing from this draft? What do you like, and what
> > > could
> > > > > be
> > > > > > improved?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Many thanks to the Committee, and everyone who has helped with
> > > > > translations
> > > > > > so far.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please join the conversation
> > > > > > <
> > > >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Draft_review
> > >
> > > > > > and share this email with others who may be interested to join,
> > too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To learn more about the UCoC project, see the Universal Code of
> > > Conduct
> > > > > > page
> > > > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct>, and
> > the
> > > > FAQ
> > > > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/FAQ>,
> > on
> > > > > Meta.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/May_2020_-_Board_of_Trustees_on_Healthy_Community_Culture,_Inclusivity,_and_Safe_Spaces
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [3]
> > > > >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Draft_review
> > > > > > [4]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Universal_Code_of_Conduct/FAQ
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Patrick Earley
> > > > > > Policy Manager, Trust and Safety
> > > > > > Wikimedia Foundation
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: [email protected]
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
> --
> Jackie Koerner, Ph.D.
> jackiekoerner.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to