Yes this remains a problem. The only thing I can think of is that in our 
current gig economy reputation is everything and timeliness of information 
feedback is more and more important. I think publicly funded research deserves 
both public access and proper attribution throughout the whole process and not 
just for the final publication.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 20, 2020, at 10:52 PM, Yaroslav Blanter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> As an actively publishing researcher, I just know that mandating open
> access publishing would mean that the author pays the (huge) publication
> fee rather than the library pays the subscription. In an ideal world, the
> universities would refund the fees, and will get subsidy from the
> governments, In our real world, the researchers will have to pay everything
> out of their own pocket, with some of them losing all possibilities to
> publish, for the lack of funds. I tried to raise this before, and the
> universal reply was that this is my problem, not the problem of the
> society. I do not expect anything else this time.
> 
> Cheers
> Yaroslav
> 
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:34 PM Shani Evenstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Jake, well written and nicely put.
>> Is this online somewhere, where we can share it further?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Shani.
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> *Shani Evenstein Sigalov*
>> 
>> * Lecturer, Tel Aviv University.
>> * EdTech Innovation Strategist, NY/American Medical Program, Sackler School
>> of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
>> 
>> * PhD Candidate, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
>> * Azrieli Foundation Research Fellow.
>> * OER & Emerging Technologies Coordinator, UNESCO Chair
>> <https://education.tau.ac.il/node/3495> on Technology,
>> Internationalization
>> and Education, School of Education, Tel Aviv University
>> <https://education.tau.ac.il/node/3495>.
>> 
>> * Member of the Board of Trustees
>> <https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/shani-evenstein-sigalov/>,
>> Wikimedia
>> Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>.
>> * Chairperson, The Hebrew Literature Digitization Society
>> <http://www.israelgives.org/amuta/580428621>.
>> * Chief Editor, Project Ben-Yehuda <http://benyehuda.org>.
>> 
>> +972-525640648
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:27 PM Pete Forsyth <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jake,
>>> 
>>> How can we most effectively support your excellent effort with this?
>>> 
>>> -Pete
>>> --
>>> Pete Forsyth
>>> User:Peteforsyth on Meta, English Wikisource, English Wikipedia, etc.
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:22 PM Tito Dutta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Very well-written and well-supported by statistics. Thanks for sharing.
>>>> Regards.
>>>> User:Titodutta
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 1:41 AM Jake Orlowitz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> My Letter to the U.S. Office for Science and Technology Policy
>>> regarding
>>>> a
>>>>> proposal for federally mandate open access to publicly-funded
>>> research...
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wikipedia is one of the ten most popular websites in the world. Each
>>>> month
>>>>> 200,000 editors improve over 6 million articles. This vital public
>>>>> information is viewed on 1 billion unique devices as our pages are
>>> loaded
>>>>> by people around the globe 7,000 times per second.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Wikipedia is the "free encyclopedia", both in its open CC-BY-SA
>>> licensing
>>>>> as well as the unpaid contributions of its volunteer editors. Yet
>>>>> Wikipedia's hundreds of thousands of editors struggle to access
>>> scholarly
>>>>> research. And, if they are able to read and cite it, then hundreds of
>>>>> millions of readers cannot verify or explore it for deeper research.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Citations are the bridge between Wikipedia articles and a broader
>>>> landscape
>>>>> of reliable, secondary sources. Citations not only allow readers to
>>>> verify
>>>>> the reliability of the facts they find in Wikipedia; through
>> citations
>>>>> readers can also deep-dive into any given topic by exploring the
>> books,
>>>>> scholarly publications, and news stories referenced in an article.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A recently released dataset of all citations with identifiers in
>>>> Wikipedia
>>>>> found that less than half of the official versions of scholarly
>>>>> publications cited with an identifier in Wikipedia are freely
>> available
>>>> on
>>>>> the web. This chasm of for editors and for readers is a tragedy of
>>> public
>>>>> education and digital literacy.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just look at the most recent global catastrophe with Coronavirus. By
>>>> April
>>>>> 2020 the main articles on COVID-19 had received 50 million views.
>>>>> Wikipedia's medical content--made up of more than 155,000 articles
>> and
>>> 1
>>>>> billion bytes of text across more than 255 languages--has been ranked
>>> as
>>>>> one of the top-3 most viewed sources for medical information on the
>>>> entire
>>>>> internet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> References are essential to the public's trust in Wikipedia. Indeed,
>>>>> Wikipedia's medical content is supported by 757,855 references in
>>> English
>>>>> and 1,596,528 in other languages, for a total of 2,354,383 across all
>>>>> languages. In English 168,985 have a PMID while 261,850 do in other
>>>>> languages. This means at least 430,835 references are journal
>> articles.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What happens when those journal articles lie behind a paywall? The
>>> public
>>>>> suffers from a dearth of good information to make decisions about
>> their
>>>>> lives as independent citizens and members of a global community.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As founder of The Wikipedia Library, I arranged partnerships with
>>> dozens
>>>> of
>>>>> leading scholarly journals, to give Wikipedia editors free access to
>>>> their
>>>>> reliable content and so they would be able to do effective and
>> rigorous
>>>>> research. This time-intensive process took 6 years to amass access to
>>>> only
>>>>> 1/5th of the most highly regarded academic publications. Frankly,
>>>> Wikipedia
>>>>> editors--volunteers who selflessly give of their intelligence and
>>> passion
>>>>> to educate--should not have to beg and borrow to access
>> publicly-funded
>>>>> research. Readers should not hit paywalls when they are seeking
>>>>> citizen-supported knowledge.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I implore you to make the bold but entirely reasonable decision and
>>>> ensure
>>>>> that taxpayers have access to the vital scientific and scholarly
>>> studies
>>>>> that they themselves fund. This is not only sensible, it is essential
>>> to
>>>>> civic health, societal progress, and human flourishing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Jake Orlowitz
>>>>> Founder of The Wikipedia Library
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications, Data and Code
>>>>> Resulting From Federally Funded Research"
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/19/2020-03189/request-for-information-public-access-to-peer-reviewed-scholarly-publications-data-and-code
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>>> New messages to: [email protected]
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>>> New messages to: [email protected]
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> New messages to: [email protected]
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: [email protected]
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to