It is important that any wiki process be applied fairly. In this case I think the Croatian wiki cannot be the first to have a new process applied. I hope that the process that Gerard recommends has been validated in some way that meets with broad, nearly universal approval.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 12:37 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > We have a database with all the citations of all Wikipedias. That database > is integrated in wikidata as we speak. What we should do is eat our own > medicine and compare sources on the same subject when the subject is > controversial. Our overriding policy is for Wikipedia to have a neutral > point of view. So while Croation sources are fine, they need to be balanced > for a NPOV. When sources with a different viewpoint are available, ignoring > them is not an option. > > At the same time, there are sources that have been found to be > untrustworthy. At some stage, sources, any and all sources can be assessed > and even rejected. > > Admins and bureaucrats have their authority because they promise to adhere > to the universal Wikipedia policies, the other reason is the trust their > community gave them at one time. In the end, we have the mechanisms and the > methods to assess the NPOV and the quality of articles. We have the > mechanisms and methods to assess the functioning of people who are trusted > to adhere to our policies. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 19:15, Ilario Valdelli <valde...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > History does not require a judge. It's the storiography to be judge. > > > > Here the problem is to give relevance to some sources and to neglect > > (completely) others. > > > > If a single not neutral source is considered as the Holy Bible, the same > > pillars of Wikipedia are infringed. > > > > Kind regards > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, 14:06 Dennis During <dcdur...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Who is the judge? Are we going to join Facebook, Google, Twitter, et al > > as > > > the new press barons? > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Dennis C. During _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
