On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well - regarding permission-commons ques the current problem with mass > upload agreements is Common's regulation that ticket-templates has to be > added by OTRS volunteers themselves, except, when you are using GLAM tool, > but GLAM tool is tailored for really huge mass uploads as it requires lot > of preliminary preparations. So, there is no good path for mid-size mass > uploads - say from 10 till 100-500 files. > > This is incredibly boring job to add 100 templates to 100 files. There are > some semiautomatic tools for this - but it still requires small programming > and/or direct personal assistance - with at least 2 clicks per file. So > OTRS volunteers - when they see agreements for for example100 pictures - > are avoiding this, becasue handing this means not only aswering for E-mail > but also 100 boring edits... > > I was addressing the issue on OTRS e-mail list, around a year ago, but the > answer was, that this is not the problem. But in fact - whenever there is > such semi-mass-upload agreement - you can observe that OTRS volunteers are > avoiding answering them. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:VisualFileChange.js can be used for mass edits. Jee _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
