In fact, a simple note that Sarah has left the WMF would, of course, have been enough from the WMF side. BUT, the obvious questions would then have been directed to Sarah in any possible way, most probably. And I guess, she just doesn't wish to answer those questions right now and I can fully understand that. That was probably what Frank meant by respecting her privacy and why he chose to write the letter as he did.
Anyway, sorry to see you go, Sarah. :( Best regards Thomas. 2014/1/9 Michael Peel <[email protected]> > > On 9 Jan 2014, at 14:32, Katherine Casey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Add me to the list of people who are surprised the WMF has chosen to > handle > > this in so public and accusatory a manner. It is presumably their right > to > > sever business relationships with employees, of course, but they > generally > > don't do so by posting a public notice detailing the employee's alleged > > misconduct. > > It seems to me that this is a "damned if you do, damned if you don’t” > scenario. If there *hadn’t* been a note to this list then I’m sure people > would have been crying out for one. Personally, I’m glad to see the > transparency and frankness, but sad to see the news. :-( > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
