On 29 April 2013 21:28, Christophe Henner <[email protected]> wrote: ... > In face of that situation, Wikimedia France board has asked WMF to > stop being a payment processor in 2013
Hi Christophe, thank you for giving this difficult decision some suitable context, and for doing so openly and promptly. Could someone advise me, is there an official table on meta showing the current list of Chapters with payment processing agreements in place for the 2013 fund raiser? Independently of any hat I happen to be wearing, I am planning on putting aside some volunteer time to examine the "admin:fundraising:program" ratio for our organizations over the next few months, so it makes sense to ensure this is achieved for the current payment processors, rather than just those organizations that are "easy" to find the figures for or come forward spontaneously. I would support other sensible top level performance indicators should they be identified and become available soon, FDC members may have a view on what might work well as the "top 5" indicators. Hopefully at least the admin ratio can be publicly shared before October this year to help foster a pragmatic discussion on simple dashboards and governance. I'm hoping that the WMF can set a lead by publishing a calculation of admin ratio for themselves. ;-) PS staff salaries are not all automatically 'admin', I hope we can agree that some program activities are entirely justifiably supported by paid staff and contractors. Thanks, Fae -- [email protected] http://j.mp/faewm Guide to email tags: http://j.mp/mfae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
