also agree to simplify the rules. what i'd really love would be to better standardize and with it simplify "volunteer community", for all elections and votes. and at least my wish would be that people who donate their time by sending code patches to software considered essential to run the site are included.
rupert. On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Asaf Bartov <[email protected]> wrote: > Also agree with Nathan. Those chapter board members who are not active on > the projects already have a far greater relative weight in selecting the > chapter-selected board seats. > > A. > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Nathan, 27/04/2013 21:34: >> >> I would go the other way, and limit the participants in the election >>> for the community seat to people who are members of the volunteer >>> community. Presumably that would include most members of most >>> organizational boards, but only include those staff and other paid >>> workers who also participate as volunteers. >>> >> >> I agree with Nathan, simplifying the rules is useful while complicating >> them for a few dozens voters is not. >> >> Nemo >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> [email protected].**org <[email protected]> >> Unsubscribe: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l> >> > > > > -- > Asaf Bartov > Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org> > > Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the > sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! > https://donate.wikimedia.org > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
