Hi all, I don't want to take away from the huge amount of work and movement contributions that were made by the Mexico, London, and other Wikimania teams, but: it's worth noting that we could organise a Wikimania with the same number of attendees for a lot less amount of volunteer time (and also money).
~1,000+ people conferences take place quite often each year, across many different academic, non-profic and commercial communities, and there are dedicated conference venues that will just sort out everything - the venue, the internet access, hotel options, the whole lot. They are often located near to international airports, or major cities, which are easy to get to from across the globe. If we wanted to, we could go as far as saying "we're meeting at this venue, delegate fees are X per day, here is the list of nearby hotels that you can stay at, it's up to you to sort out everything else yourself" - and that would lead to a very cheap Wikimania for the WMF and the local Wikimedia organisation. Rather than going for those options, we've preferred to keep things complicated - we chose not to use standard conference packages, instead picking specific locations and approaches for each Wikimania. We travel to out of the way locations. We bolt on different bespoke activities (such as evening events, and outreach activities) to those conferences that increase the complexity of the event. We ask volunteers to take on duties that we could ask attendees to take on instead (photographs/organising sessions, etc.). We vary the structure of each conference to include the preferences of each organising committee. We organise a scholarship process. If we're going to do a rational cost-benefit analysis of Wikimania, including all of the options about regularity, intentions, etc., then perhaps we should also consider the basics - what's the minimum amount that's needed to hold such an event, leaving aside the optional extras? What can we keep constant between each Wikimania: can we keep the program organisation, the approach to evening events, and the add-on events the same each year (saving volunteer and staff time)? Or perhaps we should acknowledge the extra work that goes into each bespoke Wikimania, and celebrate that? Or seek an intermediate solution - sort out the venue, program, etc., and leave hotel/food options up to attendees? Or perhaps each Wikimania should keep vying for the title of the best Wikimania ever? Thanks, Mike > On 10 Jul 2016, at 23:42, Ivan Martínez <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a lot of work, last week before Wikimania Mexico the coordination team > slept less than 4 hours each day. But for me being honest was not a shaming > time, was great. And we can have people intended to keep Wikimania annual and > run similar challenges. > > Harry, we had here 72 committed volunteers working without paid and we are > not a major developed economy. > > Darius, I think that "motivations criris afterward" must also be considered > in the planning and prior call for Wikimanía volunteers and can be avoided. > In Mexico we always tell to people that we did not want them just for giving > the best of themselves for three days around, but we wanted to keep them with > Wikimedia mission. A month ago we broke a Guinness record and 60% of > attendees were Wikimania volunteers. It is a matter of long preplanning, I > think. > > 2016-07-10 15:03 GMT-05:00 Harry Mitchell <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > Yes, London was big, and the two Wikimaniae since have been on a smaller > scale, but I'm not sure a ~1,000-person conference is significantly less of a > headache than a ~2,000-person conference, and actually I'd wager that Esino > was more logistically complicated due to the location - for example having to > arrange buses to Varenna and the airports (which were around 50 miles away). > Not that that should be taken as a criticism of the Esino team - they did a > fantastic job in a beautiful location and I'd love to have another 'scenic > Wikimania'. > > I'll let Ed tell you about what he did. I know I saw him spend a lot of time > dealing with the venue and the programme and discussing finance and > logistics, but I'm sure there are lots of other things. Speaking for myself: > those volunteers in red shirts? That was my contribution. The volunteers on > the helpdesks, running sessions, meeting and greeting, tweeting, > photographing, doing odd jobs and generally making things run smoothly ... I > recruited most of them*, got to know them, trained them, split them into > teams, did a lot of the scheduling (easier said than done - lots of moving > parts!). During the conference, they looked after the attendees, and I looked > after them. And I've never worked with such an amazing group of people. It > was a truly humbling experience, but it was a lot of work. At one point I was > receiving something like 200 emails a day just relating to Wikimania and was > having to set aside time at the start and end of the day to answer the ones > that didn't require an immediate response. I also devised the scheme of > reporting and emergency/contingency planning for volunteers (thankfully this > wasn't necessary, but the death of a Wikimedian at that year's Wikimedia > Conference was painfully fresh in our memories), and spent a lot of time > trying to drum up and channel interest within the UK Wikimedian community. > I'm sure there were other things, but those roles alone took up a significant > amount of time - certainly in excess of 40 hours a week in the final few > weeks before the conference. > > *(Not wishing to take credit from anyone else; I worked closely with lots of > other people on all these things, particularly Hera Hussain, and Fabian > Tompsett and Chris McKenna who were at the time employed by Wikimedia UK.) > > > Harry Mitchell > http://enwp.org/User:HJ <http://enwp.org/User:HJ> > +44 (0) 7507 536 971 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207507%20536%20971> > Skype: harry_j_mitchell > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Lodewijk <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Thanks Harry, Ed, > > Of course London was a bit of an exceptionally big Wikimania - but did you > evaluate your effort somewhere, and note what you spent your time on > somewhere? Just to get an impression which components take most effort (as > Dariusz suggested)? > > Best, > Lodewijk > > 2016-07-10 20:25 GMT+02:00 Harry Mitchell <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > I agree with Ed here. Organising a conference of this size is a huge > undertaking to ask of volunteers. I wouldn't want to see Wikimania go down > the road of being organised by a team of professional conference organisers > because then it would lose the organic community feel that makes it so > special, but we shouldn't rule out stipends for the local team. Otherwise we > end up with the slightly odd situation of the WMF or local chapter bringing > in paid staff to fill gaps left by volunteers but the volunteers still > effectively working full-time unpaid. I had a much smaller role in 2014 than > Ed and others and was fortunate to be in a position to dedicate a lot of time > to it; I certainly wouldn't be in a position now to devote as much time as I > did for free and without wishing to speak for Ed, I doubt he would be either > even if he was willing. > > If that's a problem in major developed economies, I'd imagine it would be > even more of a problem in places where people have less disposable income. > > Harry Mitchell > http://enwp.org/User:HJ <http://enwp.org/User:HJ> > +44 (0) 7507 536 971 <tel:%2B44%20%280%29%207507%20536%20971> > Skype: harry_j_mitchell > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Edward Saperia <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Thanks for that comment, Dariusz; > > Wikimania London took over two years of preparation, and occupied me full > time for six months in the run up to the event. It's a massive undertaking, > and in retrospect it seems deeply unfair to expect volunteers to do this. > > There was a bidding process, so there was heavy pressure to > minimise/understate the budget - which mostly comes at the cost of the > volunteers. I think the community just has to be more realistic about what it > costs to put on a 1000+ person event. > > Were I to do it again I would absolutely include subsistence for the > organising team in the budget. It needs professional commitment and > professional skills, even with WMF staff support. > > I do think that the movement deserves an annual event, and particularly that > the WMF should capitalise on it more from a comms perspective. Wiki*edia is a > significant entity and we should be presenting ourselves as such. > > Edward Saperia > Conference Director Wikimania London <http://www.wikimanialondon.org/> > email <mailto:[email protected]> • facebook > <http://www.facebook.com/edsaperia> • twitter > <http://www.twitter.com/edsaperia> • 07796955572 > 133-135 Bethnal Green Road, E2 7DG > > In the same time, I've seen the following problems over the years, not > directly linked to the financial cost (which in the face of our relative > financial stability can be justified by the benefits, depending on how we > define them): > - huge WMF staff involvement (most Wikimanias run smoothly also thanks to > countless hours put in by the staff), > - huge volunteer local organizers involvement (in fact, my observation is > that many chapters organizing WIkimanias suffer from a motivation crisis > afterward). > > [...] > > While we can get the money (at least for now), the human involvement cost is > something I would not dare to dismiss just by emphasizing the benefits of > Wikimania for the movement. > > [...] > > Instead of discussing whether we should have a Wikimania every year or not, > perhaps we should try to list and discuss the reasons why it is such a big > strain? If it is clear that we can't afford it every year (because of the > human cost, probably more importantly than the finances), the decision to > break with the annual format will be a natural consequence of such an > analysis. > > [...] > > Dariusz Jemielniak ("pundit", a current Trustee). > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l> > > > > > -- > Iván Martínez > Presidente - Wikimedia México A.C. > User:ProtoplasmaKid > > // Mis comunicaciones respecto a Wikipedia/Wikimedia pueden tener una > moratoria en su atención debido a que es un voluntariado. > // Ayuda a proteger a Wikipedia, dona ahora: https://donate.wikimedia.org > <https://donate.wikimedia.org/>_______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
