I think this email has been corrupted...
On Feb 11, 2013 2:15 AM, "James Forrester" <[email protected]> wrote:

> [Please note that I send this as a volunteer, and in no connexion to
> the Wikimedia Foundation.]
>
> Dear all,
>
> == Preamble ==
>
> Last year, after some discussion on this list[0] and other places, I
> felt we as a community had said we were unhappy with the traditional
> ad-hoc system for selecting the location for each year's Wikimania,
> and wanted something different, a process that involved the community
> and was more transparent, clearer and possibly set out candidate areas
> or countries rather than inviting interested bids alone. In the hope
> that the community would self-organise along these lines, I haven't
> done anything to re-run the existing system.
>
> However, no real discussion has taken place, and it's clear
>
>
>
> [0] -
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimania-l/2011-November/003225.html
> etc.
>
>
> It's getting towards the end of November, which means it is time to
> run the Wikimania bidding process for 2013[0].
>
> Given the traditional absence of a formal system, I'm putting myself
> forward as Jury[1] co-ordinator - a non-voting person who helps the
> Jury form and Bids get started up, sets the timeline[2], and hopefully
> makes sure everything happens smoothly.
>
> In this role, I would like to make two requests:
>
> Firstly, I'm sure the whole Wikimedia community would love to see as
> many good bids as possible. There are already a few bids[3] on Meta,
> but if you or your local community are thinking about putting one in,
> I'd urge you to get started now - there's not much time left before
> new bids will not be accepted. Making a good bid for Wikimania can be
> a lot of work, but we all benefit from there being a strong field of
> bids.
>
>
> Secondly, [Please note that I send this as a volunteer, and in no
> connexion to the Wikimedia Foundation.]
>
> Dear all,
>
> I write again to ask for people to submit bids to host Wikimania in
> 2014[0], and also to serve on the Jury to select which bid will be
> chosen, in my traditonal .
>
>
> == Request for bids ==
>
> As always, the whole Wikimedia community would love to see as many
> good bids as possible. There are only two bids[1] on Meta, so if you
> or your local community are thinking about putting one in, or
> re-submitting one that is now withdrawn, I'd urge you to get started
> right away - there is very little time left. Making a good bid for
> Wikimania can be a lot of work, but we all benefit from there being a
> strong field of bids.
>
> I have updated the timeline[2] to have an (extremely) foreshortened
> pre-bidding process, which means that all provisional bids must be
> created by 23:59 UTC 3 March 2013 at the latest - i.e., three weeks'
> time from when this e-mail was written. I appreciate that this is
> short notice, but it's very important to give the winning bid the time
> to make a success, and the idea of bidding for Wikimanias should not
> be completely new to everyone by now.
>
>
> == Request for Jury volunteers ==
>
> I would like to invite volunteers to serve on the Wikimania 2014 Jury.
> There is a list of general requirements on Meta[4], but to summarise:
>
> * The Jury will be mostly community volunteers with possibly some
> Wikimedia Foundation staff or Board members;
> * We of course want a mix of people from a diverse range of
> backgrounds, sexes, cultures and regions of the world;
> * We want to represent the community across the different projects and
> activities;
> * You can't be on the Jury if you are closely involved in a Bid (it's
> a conflict of interest); and
> * You need to have some free time during the selection period
> (March-April).
>
> If you wish to be involved in the Jury, please e-mail me (off-list) at
> jdforrester at gmail.com - I will announce the Jury in one week's
> time, so please contact me immediately.
>
>
> == Note ==
>
> Last year, after some discussion on the Wikimania list[4] and other
> places, I felt we as a community had said we were unhappy with the
> traditional ad-hoc system for selecting the location for each year's
> Wikimania, and wanted something different, a process that involved the
> community and was more transparent, clearer and possibly set out
> candidate areas or countries rather than inviting interested bids
> alone. In the hope that the community would self-organise along these
> lines, I haven't done anything to re-run the existing system.
>
> However, no real discussion has taken place, and the process is now
> four months overdue[5]. It's clear that a community-agreed system
> won't magically snap into existence in the next few days.  I would
> implore the community to work to establish a selection system for 2015
> and beyond, but we cannot wait for 2014. Therefore, on the basis that
> I've done this before, I am running the process for Wikimania 2014 as
> before, as a non-voting organiser like the previous times. I would
> hope that this is the last time.
>
>
>
> Please also consider passing this message on (and translating it!) for
> your wiki's community forum for those that don't read these mailing
> lists.
>
> Thank you, and good luck to all Bids.
>
>
> [0] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014
> [1] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014/Bids
> [5] -
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014_bid_selection_timeline?oldid=5233347
> [3] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_jury
> [4] -
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimania-l/2011-November/003225.html
> etc.
> [5] -
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2014_bid_selection_timeline?oldid=5042528
>
> Yours,
> --
> James D. Forrester
> [email protected]
> [[Wikipedia:User:Jdforrester|James F.]] (speaking purely in a personal
> capacity)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

Reply via email to