-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.05.2010 19:53, schrieb Adrián Chaves Fernández: > Revising the translation of this scenario, I found out the third option > (going > through the river with the merfolk) is not avaliable anymore (it must have > been a while since the last time I played the campaign, I guess). So, with > this in mind, I think the string from 696 to 716 (both included) in the PO > files are not needed anymore. I would report a bug, but the truth is that I'm > not really sure whether there's a reason for them to be there or not. > > Should I revise their translation? Will the third option be back in the near > future?
Mentioned this to zookeeper in #wesnoth-dev on irc.freenode.net: [20:15:26] <Ivanovic> zookeeper: https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-i18n/2010-05/msg00000.html [20:23:53] <zookeeper> Ivanovic, that third option seems to work just fine for me [20:24:04] <Ivanovic> okay [20:24:12] <zookeeper> i don't know why the thinks it doesn't...all you gotta do is take a merman to the east edge of the river, and it works for me Looks like a case of "works for me". Please investigate further if it really does not work for you. If that is the case, write a bug report and attach a save! Cheers, Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvq8vEACgkQfFda9thizwWN/ACeL18y8H+LWU12vzEL9CRPwS8D 9C0AoIycpho2mpJWX6NalZ1MO4vSWxpH =z5oa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-i18n mailing list Wesnoth-i18n@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-i18n
