Above and beyond. Thank you very much! On Monday, 3 February 2025 at 05:14:25 UTC-5 gjr80 wrote:
> Confirmed it this afternoon, leaks will change from 0 to 1 when triggered > (or 'Leaking' as displayed din the WS View+ app). WH55 is quite tolerable > when triggered and placed in sealed container. > > Gary > > On Monday, 3 February 2025 at 11:13:16 UTC+10 bell...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I should add, I wasn’t keen to trigger it either. Knowing the observation >> name and that it goes from 0 to non-0 is all I really need to know. I plan >> to configure my weewx-pushover extension to send a notification when it is >> non-0. >> When I have it all configured, I will trigger as a final test. >> Thanks again. rich >> >> On Sunday, 2 February 2025 at 06:22:30 UTC-5 bell...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Gary, >>> Perfect. Thank you very much! >>> rich >>> On Saturday, 1 February 2025 at 23:29:15 UTC-5 gjr80 wrote: >>> >>>> You should see a field leakx in archive records and loop packets where >>>> x is the channel number to which your WH55 is assigned. The value will be >>>> 0 >>>> when not triggered and (I believe) 1 when triggered. The Ecowitt telnet >>>> API >>>> documentation is very, shall we say, non-specific about the WH55 >>>> non-triggered/triggered values. I can confirm the value 0 indicates the >>>> WH55 is not triggered and I'm not going to have the household experience a >>>> triggered WH55 just now so I can test the triggered value :). That being >>>> said, I've just noticed an omission in the driver that will result in >>>> archive records containing an average of the loop packet 'leak values' >>>> rather than the most recent loop packet value as it should. You can fix >>>> that by adding the highlighted stanzas to your weewx.conf [Accumulator] >>>> stanza: >>>> >>>> [Accumulator] >>>> .... >>>> [[leak1]] >>>> extractor = last >>>> [[leak2]] >>>> extractor = last >>>> [[leak3]] >>>> extractor = last >>>> [[leak4]] >>>> extractor = last >>>> >>>> Of course if you have mapped any of the leakx fields to some other >>>> field name you will need to change the [[ ]] contents accordingly. >>>> >>>> The battery value of 5 indicates a fully charged battery, the battery >>>> field for the WH55 is an integer from 0 to 5 inclusive with 0 and 1 >>>> indicating a 'low battery'. The signal level is a quasi-signal level in >>>> that it indicates the number of the last four packets from that sensor >>>> that >>>> were successfully received by the gateway. 4 is good, 0 is not good. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> On Sunday, 2 February 2025 at 11:24:09 UTC+10 bell...@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>>> weewx-gw1000 and ecowitt wh55 >>>>> >>>>> I recently got a wh55. When running weewx-gw1000 as a driver directly, >>>>> I see the following: 'wh55_ch1_batt': '5', 'wh55_ch1_sig': '4' in the >>>>> output. My googling has let me down... What are the expected values for >>>>> 'batt' and 'sig'. Or more specfically, how do I know when it has dected a >>>>> water leak versus when “it is dry”? >>>>> Thanks! rich >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/1c9d70c8-7bf2-48a4-96e3-61c90805e689n%40googlegroups.com.
