I should add, I wasn’t keen to trigger it either. Knowing the observation 
name and that it goes from 0 to non-0 is all I really need to know. I plan 
to configure my weewx-pushover extension to send a notification when it is 
non-0.
When I have it all configured, I will trigger as a final test.
Thanks again. rich

On Sunday, 2 February 2025 at 06:22:30 UTC-5 bell...@gmail.com wrote:

> Gary,
> Perfect. Thank you very much!
> rich
> On Saturday, 1 February 2025 at 23:29:15 UTC-5 gjr80 wrote:
>
>> You should see a field leakx in archive records and loop packets where x 
>> is the channel number to which your WH55 is assigned. The value will be 0 
>> when not triggered and (I believe) 1 when triggered. The Ecowitt telnet API 
>> documentation is very, shall we say, non-specific about the WH55 
>> non-triggered/triggered values. I can confirm the value 0 indicates the 
>> WH55 is not triggered and I'm not going to have the household experience a 
>> triggered WH55 just now so I can test the triggered value :). That being 
>> said, I've just noticed an omission in the driver that will result in 
>> archive records containing an average of the loop packet 'leak values' 
>> rather than the most recent loop packet value as it should. You can fix 
>> that by adding the highlighted stanzas to your weewx.conf [Accumulator] 
>> stanza:
>>
>> [Accumulator]
>>     ....
>>     [[leak1]]
>>         extractor = last
>>     [[leak2]]
>>         extractor = last
>>     [[leak3]]
>>         extractor = last
>>     [[leak4]]
>>         extractor = last
>>
>> Of course if you have mapped any of the leakx fields to some other field 
>> name you will need to change the [[ ]] contents accordingly.
>>
>> The battery value of 5 indicates a fully charged battery, the battery 
>> field for the WH55 is an integer from 0 to 5 inclusive with 0 and 1 
>> indicating a 'low battery'. The signal level is a quasi-signal level in 
>> that it indicates the number of the last four packets from that sensor that 
>> were successfully received by the gateway. 4 is good, 0 is not good.
>>
>> Gary
>> On Sunday, 2 February 2025 at 11:24:09 UTC+10 bell...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> weewx-gw1000 and ecowitt wh55
>>>
>>> I recently got a wh55. When running weewx-gw1000 as a driver directly, I 
>>> see the following: 'wh55_ch1_batt': '5', 'wh55_ch1_sig': '4' in the output. 
>>> My googling has let me down... What are the expected values for 'batt' and 
>>> 'sig'. Or more specfically, how do I know when it has dected a water leak 
>>> versus when “it is dry”?
>>> Thanks! rich
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/fdffcee4-5f80-49e8-a1b6-8e0735f50f25n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to