yup - overloaded terminology.  Sounds a little like running a process under 
cgroups isolation 15+ years ago.  Looking that up briefly I see the term 
'process container' which I guess is the same thing.  Thanks.

On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 6:21:16 AM UTC-7 Paul R Anderson wrote:

> Vince,
> Your confusion is probably caused by the enormous popularity of Docker. At 
> this point most of us hear the word Container and only think of Docker. 
> This is also a huge reason why LXC Containers are nowhere near as popular 
> as Docker containers , no one knows they exist, let alone what they are.  
> *LXC Containers are system containers*
> *Docker Containers are Application containers*
> There are generally at least two types of containers: Application 
> containers, and System containers
> There's a good blog post from Ubuntu that explains it much better than I 
> can.
> What are Linux containers? 
> <https://ubuntu.com/blog/what-are-linux-containers>
>
> Brief excerpt from the blog post:
>
> " Application vs system containers
> Application containers (such as Docker) are containers running a single 
> process per container. They run stateless types of workloads so that you 
> can ramp up and down as needed – create new containers and delete them at 
> any time. Usually, you don’t need to care about the lifecycle of those 
> containers, as they are meant to be ephemeral.
>
> The other type of containers, system containers, are much closer to a 
> virtual or a physical machine. They run a full operating system inside 
> them, and you manage them exactly as you would a virtual or a physical 
> machine. That means you can install packages inside them, you can manage 
> services, define backup policies, monitoring, and all other aspects as you 
> usually would with a virtual machine. These containers are usually very 
> long-lasting. If you need to update them, you can do so with the normal 
> tooling of the Linux distribution you are using. It also means that you 
> will get normal security updates from distributions for those containers, 
> so you wouldn’t need to wait for any image to be published to get the 
> security fixes. "
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 8:10 PM vince <vince...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have to admit being a little confused.  A container running multiple 
>> processes that you can ssh into isn't a container, it's a virtual machine.
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 8, 2024 at 4:42:00 AM UTC-7 Graham Eddy wrote:
>>
>>> i suggest testing before publishing..
>>> that won’t work without the permissions towards end of my lxc/105.conf 
>>> file
>>> *⊣GE⊢*
>>>
>>> On 8 May 2024, at 9:25 PM, G7LTT <enic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Updated to add USB device to the container.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "weewx-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to weewx-user+...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/dd2f4126-94ec-4456-b7c1-fc0fce4a6d3an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/dd2f4126-94ec-4456-b7c1-fc0fce4a6d3an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/a3740533-b43c-4a87-a879-b50fb2f70aaan%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to