Thanks.. that did it. I thought it was strange using the constructor there :)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Mike Schrag <msch...@mdimension.com> wrote:
> yeah -- docs bug in ERTaggableEntity ... Sorry about that. They got out of
> date. I think it USED to be what was in ERTaggableEntity and then changed.
>
> ms
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:35 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> not sure which docs you were looking at, but the package.html (which i
>> consider to be The Docs (TM) ) looks correct:
>>
>> public ERTaggable<Person> taggable() {
>> return ERTaggable.taggable(this);
>> }
>>
>> public static ERTaggableEntity<Person> taggableEntity() {
>> return ERTaggableEntity.taggableEntity(Person.ENTITY_NAME);
>> }
>>
>> notice it's using the factory method not the constructor.
>>
>> was this a misread or a docs bug somewhere else?
>>
>> ms
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>
>>> Another hitch. Docs say to create a convenience method:
>>>
>>> ERTaggableEntity provides entity-level tag management and fetching
>>> methods. Typically you would provide a cover method from your entity
>>> class to an instance of an ERTaggableEntity: public class Person
>>> extends _Person { ... public static ERTaggableEntity taggableEntity()
>>> { return new ERTaggableEntity(Person.ENTITY_NAME); } }
>>>
>>> So.. when I define
>>>
>>> public static ERTaggableEntity taggableEntity() {
>>> return new ERTaggableEntity(Company.ENTITY_NAME);
>>> }
>>>
>>> I get an error since Company.ENTITY_NAME returns a string where as the
>>> ERTaggableEntity expects an EOEntity in the constructor. However,
>>> nothing else seems to work there either. Another point where I must be
>>> doing something wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Joe Little <jmlit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I wanted a to-many relationship for attachments on multiple entities
>>>> (journals, payments,invoices, whatnot). In the end, I added that one
>>>> line model dependency and it work. My model defines an entity called
>>>> FileAttachment, which itself is modeled as a to-many for multiple
>>>> other entities. FileAttachment has only the to-one relationship to
>>>> ERAttachment as it seemingly requires based on what's documented. This
>>>> may add a little work in creating an extra entity before uploads can
>>>> happen, but it cleanly allows the two-many that I need.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Mike Schrag <msch...@mdimension.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> sketchy.
>>>>>
>>>>> In your model, it has a to-one relationship to ERAttachment, right? it
>>>>> should have figured that out automagically and not even required
>>>>> ERAttachment declared explicitly, though it's generally a good thing to
>>>>> do anyway, since an explicit declaration defines the version #.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 4:56 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Never mind my last comment. Yes, I put the below modelDependencies
>>>>>> value in my primary migration, and it works now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mike Schrag <msch...@mdimension.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> hmmm ... out of curiosity, in your ERAttachmentMigration subclass, if
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> add the method:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> �...@override
>>>>>>> public NSArray<ERXModelVersion> modelDependencies() {
>>>>>>> return new NSArray<ERXModelVersion>(new ERXModelVersion("ERAttachment",
>>>>>>> 1));
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> does that fix it? we should probably put that in there.
>>>>>>> ms
>>>>>>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll do that. Also ran into trouble with ERAttachment. Doesn't it
>>>>>>> auto-migrate in the table creation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Failed to execute 'ALTER TABLE FILE_ATTACHMENT ADD CONSTRAINT
>>>>>>> FILE_ATTACHMENT_ATTACHMENT_ID_id_FK FOREIGN KEY (ATTACHMENT_ID)
>>>>>>> REFERENCES ERAttachment (id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED'
>>>>>>> ERROR: relation "erattachment" does not exist
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "If you use Project Wonder migrations and migrateOnStartup, then the
>>>>>>> ERAttachment tables will be automatically created for you on the first
>>>>>>> launch. If you do not, then you can either manually execute the
>>>>>>> .migration SQL scripts that are in the Resources folder (execute them
>>>>>>> in numeric order), or you can open the EOModel and generate SQL for
>>>>>>> your particular database."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I definitely have the migrations running as that's how I'm building my
>>>>>>> DB and adding ERTaggable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Mike Schrag <msch...@mdimension.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i honestly don't know why we don't just tell you this outright rather
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> make you visually diff the two ... seems like something these
>>>>>>> new-fangled
>>>>>>> computational machines would be good at. feel free to log a jira on
>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ms
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> doh.. didn't see that when checking the two.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Mike Schrag <msch...@mdimension.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you can see from the two connection dicts what the diff is ...
>>>>>>> AffiliateEOModel explicitly declares a plugin name while ERTaggable does
>>>>>>> not. Just set a global override for plugin and it should fix your
>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ms
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Joe Little wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm getting this error,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A fatal exception occurred: The connection dictionaries for ERTaggable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and AffiliateEOModel have the same URL and username, but the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> connection dictionaries are not equal. Check your connection
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dictionaries carefully! This problem is often caused by jdbc2Info not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> matching between the two. One fix for this is to set
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ERTaggable.removeJdbc2Info=true and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AffiliateEOModel.removeJdbc2Info=true in your Properties file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ERTaggable={password = ""; username = "postgres"; URL =
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "jdbc:postgresql://localhost/affiliates"; }; and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AffiliateEOModel={driver = "org.postgresql.Driver"; plugin =
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "PostgresqlPlugIn"; password = ""; username = "postgres"; URL =
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "jdbc:postgresql://localhost/affiliates"; })
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've also put those two properties in the Properties file without
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> help. I've defined my database via Properties as well:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dbConnectURLGLOBAL=jdbc:postgresql://localhost/affiliates
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dbConnectUserGLOBAL=postgres
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dbConnectPasswordGLOBAL=
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has someone seen this before and can suggest what the answer was?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email sent to msch...@mdimension.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com
>>
>> This email sent to msch...@mdimension.com
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
