I load it asynchronously using a javascript snippet, never wanted to put that in <head>. This is not a "limitation" per se, you can include it in your template and/or insert some code in web2py_ajax.html and "solve" the problem. Anyway, as for current response.include_files() capacity, assuming that something ends in js is a javascript is just a hack (i.e. it's not a standard).
On Friday, September 21, 2012 10:12:43 PM UTC+2, howesc wrote: > > good question....maybe pass a tuple of (URL, type) to > response.files.append? but right now tuples are interpreted as inline CSS > or JS... > > the other thought is that this ends in /js....would it be acceptable to > assume .js or /js are both js file types? does anyone know if /js is a > google convention, or just a maps API bug? > > --
