good question....maybe pass a tuple of (URL, type) to
response.files.append? but right now tuples are interpreted as inline CSS
or JS...
the other thought is that this ends in /js....would it be acceptable to
assume .js or /js are both js file types? does anyone know if /js is a
google convention, or just a maps API bug?
On Friday, September 21, 2012 1:09:50 PM UTC-7, Niphlod wrote:
>
> how do you propose to detect the correct embedding code (as in <script
> src="">, <link href="">) without knowing from the extension what the file
> actually is ?
>
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 10:07:28 PM UTC+2, howesc wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a desire to do the following:
>> response.files.append('http://maps.google.com/maps/api/js?sensor=false')
>>
>> note that the URL has no .js suffix. as best i can tell
>> response.include_files() in 2.0.9 will just ignore this file and never
>> output the URL. (i had hacked an older version of web2py to output this but
>> i'm upgrading now....)
>>
>> is there a generic way that we can use URLs that don't follow "typical"
>> naming conventions, but still get them outputted correctly?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> cfh
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
