I just thought that one might want to use the manager (without prefix) role for a different propose so I was just playing safe. I agree about namespace pollution.
We just need more opinions on this matter (Is it safe to just use manager role or general read/write/etc permissions?). And if we reach a conclusion I am happy to change. Also the the plugin_web2admin->plugin_admin is OK, especially if it will become official :) To others: please give feedback on this. -rif sâmbătă, 15 septembrie 2012, 15:25:27 UTC+3, Alan Etkin a scris: > > Shouldn't this be called plugin_admin or similar (following the > plugin_wiki fashion)? > > Does w2x_etc naming use any plugin convention?. For instance, in Pyodel > (also a plugin) I rely in an application manager role (without a prefix). > Maybe we can adopt a standard naming convention for plugin roles. Also, I > think that roles with prefixes somehow polute the group space. > > El lunes, 10 de septiembre de 2012 10:49:35 UTC-3, rif escribió: >> >> I started the development of a new django-like admin interface. >> >> You can find it here: https://github.com/rif/web2admin >> >> It is very basic but still usable because it uses SQLFORM.smartgrid. >> >> I am announcing it early because I need your feedback and feature >> requests so that I can find out if grid will be able to support all the >> desired features. >> >> For quick start you can create a w2a_root group and add your user to that >> group. >> >> -rif >> > --
