That issue tracking app is quite broken, having tried it myself. though from what I hear the forum is solid. I don't know why we aren't using pyforum.
On Monday, April 23, 2012 1:33:13 PM UTC-7, Anthony wrote: > > > Back to the original topic though - Why doesn't web2py do more dogfooding? >> I know that using code.google.com is good since it's free, but come one, >> let's show the world that Massimo puts his money where his mouth is... >> > > Currently on the canine menu: > http://web2py.com <http://web2py.com/examples/default/index> > http://web2py.com/book > http://www.web2pyslices.com <http://www.web2pyslices.com/home> > http://web2py.com/poweredby > http://www.web2py.com/appliances > http://web2py.com/layouts > http://web2py.com/demo_admin/default/site > (not to mention some legacy apps, such as AlterEgo, web2py Plugins, > and web2py Wiki) > > And of course, Massimo and all the contributors are using web2py for their > private projects. > > I'd rather see the community spend more time improving (and documenting) > the framework and building a robust CMS than adding dog food just for the > sake of "dogfooding." Note, the community isn't using them, but we do have > existing forum <http://pyforum.org/>, Q&A <http://www.qa-stack.com/>, and > issue-tracking <http://www.i-track.org/> apps. > > Anthony > >
