I am about to give up on uwsgi. Everything was working, and I pulled the
latest code now it doesn't work, but my other server with the same code
works.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Bruce Wade <bruce.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the explanation the error was strange because first I was
> getting permission connecting to the database error I updated that then I
> got that error.
>
> Oh well it is all working now. 2 systems (1 apache, 1 nginx + uwsgi) on a
> load balancer going to add a 3rd nginx + uwsgi
> --
> Regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Roberto De Ioris <robe...@unbit.it>wrote:
>
>>
>> > Ok got it running, restarted uwsgi not sure what the issue was.
>> >
>> > However following the guides I my static content isn't being loaded:
>> > http://50.116.6.124
>>
>>
>> The error you got earlier, happens when you do not read the body of the
>> request (for example when you have POST data, but you do not read them).
>> This is how nginx works. You can avoid that (if you do not want to read
>> post data) with --post-buffering <n> in uWSGI. It is a trick to force
>> uWSGI to blindly read the http body independently by your app.
>>
>> Regarding static files, you have to fight with nginx (uWSGI should only
>> manage the python part)
>>
>> Normally working on the location directives and root/alias options is
>> enough
>>
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Bruce Wade <bruce.w...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> uwsgi is sure not as easy to get working correctly as apache is. Keep
>> >> getting the following:
>> >> 2012/04/18 10:44:49 [error] 23686#0: *8454 upstream prematurely closed
>> >> connection while reading response header from upstream, client:
>> >> 173.180.212.86, server: youadstage, request: "GET / HTTP/1.1",
>> upstream:
>> >> "uwsgi://127.0.0.1:9001", host: "50.116.6.124"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Bruno Rocha
>> >> <rochacbr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> There are directions for this on book
>> >>> http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/4#session
>> >>>
>> >>> Store session on db or set separate=True
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Bruno Rocha
>> >>> <rochacbr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I recommend you to store sessions on db or cache like memcached,
>> >>>> redis... If you are going to run in a load balance, sessions in disk
>> >>>> will
>> >>>> be a problem.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Wade
>> >>>> <bruce.w...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Currently FS
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Bruno Rocha
>> >>>>> <rochacbr...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Are you storing sessions in db or FS?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno
>> >>>>>> Em 18/04/2012 02:18, "Bruce Wade" <bruce.w...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Yeah, I am not sure how well web2py can handle load but I am going
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> find out pretty fast. I finished setting up a load balancer today,
>> >>>>>>> going to
>> >>>>>>> have 3 servers under it running nginx + uwsgi + web2py a single
>> >>>>>>> dedicated
>> >>>>>>> DB server for now, but figure I am going to need some slave read
>> >>>>>>> only
>> >>>>>>> servers. The speed at which web2py allows you to develop
>> >>>>>>> applications
>> >>>>>>> will surpass any load issues, well unless it could only handle
>> >>>>>>> 50,000
>> >>>>>>> users/per second then that would be a big issue :D
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> My one concern is how good the sticky sessions on linode's
>> >>>>>>> nodebalancer works.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regarding uwsgi I have ready time out issues when using it with
>> >>>>>>> web2py.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>> Bruce
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM, pbreit
>> >>>>>>> <pbreitenb...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I've never read anything but good things about uwsgi. Django and
>> >>>>>>>> Flask both promote it.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>> Bruce Wade
>> >>>>>>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>> >>>>>>> http://www.wadecybertech.com
>> >>>>>>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers
>> Online
>> >>>>>>> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>> Bruce Wade
>> >>>>> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>> >>>>> http://www.wadecybertech.com
>> >>>>> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
>> >>>>> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bruno Rocha
>> >>>> [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Bruno Rocha
>> >>> [http://rochacbruno.com.br]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> --
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Bruce Wade
>> >> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>> >> http://www.wadecybertech.com
>> >> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
>> >> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Bruce Wade
>> > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
>> > http://www.wadecybertech.com
>> > http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
>> > http://www.warplydesigned.com
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Roberto De Ioris
>> http://unbit.it
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Regards,
> Bruce Wade
> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
> http://www.wadecybertech.com
> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
> http://www.warplydesigned.com
>
>


-- 
-- 
Regards,
Bruce Wade
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade
http://www.wadecybertech.com
http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online
http://www.warplydesigned.com

Reply via email to