Currently FS On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you storing sessions in db or FS? > > http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno > Em 18/04/2012 02:18, "Bruce Wade" <bruce.w...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > Yeah, I am not sure how well web2py can handle load but I am going to find >> out pretty fast. I finished setting up a load balancer today, going to have >> 3 servers under it running nginx + uwsgi + web2py a single dedicated DB >> server for now, but figure I am going to need some slave read only servers. >> The speed at which web2py allows you to develop applications >> will surpass any load issues, well unless it could only handle 50,000 >> users/per second then that would be a big issue :D >> >> My one concern is how good the sticky sessions on linode's nodebalancer >> works. >> >> Regarding uwsgi I have ready time out issues when using it with web2py. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Bruce >> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I've never read anything but good things about uwsgi. Django and Flask >>> both promote it. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> Regards, >> Bruce Wade >> http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade >> http://www.wadecybertech.com >> http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online >> http://www.warplydesigned.com >> >> -- -- Regards, Bruce Wade http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade http://www.wadecybertech.com http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online http://www.warplydesigned.com
