No biggy, after considering the time it would take me to find the right solution and integrate it properly vs the overall complexity of the problem to solve, I decided to write my own solution and I am in the middle of doing that.
The JSON grammar is quite simple and elegant (especially once you consider that most of the complexity are repetitive cases of recursion) and I happen to have a decent amount of experience with regular expressions. Once done, the my solution will be bug free and the support that will come with that solution will be through the roof :P. Thanks for all the advices :). On Sep 20, 12:52 pm, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also check JsonBox , its used in RedBox 2D game engine. > > On 9/20/11, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > heres what i found: > > from json.org > > C: > > > JSON_checker. > > JSON parser. > > M's JSON parser. > > YAJL. > > cJSON. > > Jansson. > > js0n. > > LibU. > > jsmn. > > cson. > > json-c. > > > C++: > > > jsoncpp. > > zoolib. > > JOST. > > CAJUN. > > libjson. > > nosjob. > > JSONKit. > > JsonBox. > > > On 9/20/11, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> yeah may be due to nature of C/C++ is not used for programming web > >> apps json support is quite weak. > > >> Python's Native json lib are a lot more mature than C++ versions. > > >> Did u also check AMF as alternative? > > >> On 9/20/11, Magnitus <eric_vallee2...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > >>> Thanks for all the feedback from everyone. > > >>> For the json cpp libraries, I find that jsoncpp looks unpolished with > >>> outstanding bugs (it is still advertised as Beta) and it is a hassle > >>> to install (you have to install some Python modules just to read the > >>> documentation). > > >>> Cajun looked more polished and minimalistic (a positive trait), but it > >>> also looks abandoned and doesn't seem to have an entry point as far as > >>> documentation goes. > > >>> I'll look at them a bit longer, but at this point I'm inclined to take > >>> a look at the c libraries instead. > > >>> On Sep 19, 3:19 pm, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> so the power is all yours,. use JSON or AMF > > >>>> There are many C++ Json libs for sure. > > >>>> (http://jsoncpp.sourceforge.net/) > > >>>> For AMF (Binary Protocol , Lesser packet size , Higher > >>>> Performance)http://code.google.com/p/libamfx/ > > >>>> On 9/20/11, Magnitus <eric_vallee2...@yahoo.ca> wrote: > > >>>> > I wrote the engine myself so it's as flexible as I need it to be ;). > > >>>> > Haven't gone on the XML wagon yet, was simply considering it. > > >>>> > I did work with JSON for the AJAX component of my web server so that > >>>> > solution is looking pretty good atm. I thought it was mostly a > >>>> > Javascript-Server thing and wasn't aware there were some C/C++ > >>>> > libraries for it though :). > > >>>> > On Sep 19, 1:36 pm, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> >> yes, json/jsonp is much better portocol for gaming coz due to lesser > >>>> >> size and its properties. > >>>> >> But if he already have XML engine for his game he should go with it > >>>> >> (coz all the game engine supports XML , not any with JSON support i > >>>> >> know of yet.) > > >>>> >> On 9/20/11, Ross Peoples <ross.peop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> >> > You can try JSON, Python 2.6+ has a C JSON parser in it already > >>>> >> > which > >>>> >> > web2py > >>>> >> > uses for JSON communications. I haven't done any testing with it > >>>> >> > versus > >>>> >> > XML, > >>>> >> > but JSON is such a simple protocol with minimal parsing > >>>> >> > requirements > >>>> >> > that > >>>> >> > I'd imagine it's much faster than parsing XML. > >
