Unless there is a strong objection I will modify the code in trunk to use index.mobile.html
view = '.'.join(view.split().insert(-1,'mobile')) On Aug 30, 2:13 am, Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good point. Couldn't you also do something like index.mobi.html or > > index.html.mobi? I don't think these view names would necessarily have to > > be exposed as URLs -- they just need to be used server side to render the > > page appropriately. > > It is only a semantic issue, because the pattern for any API is terminating > with the extension format. .json, .xml, .csv . it is more elegant IMO than > x.json.mobi
