On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point. Couldn't you also do something like index.mobi.html or > index.html.mobi? I don't think these view names would necessarily have to > be exposed as URLs -- they just need to be used server side to render the > page appropriately. It is only a semantic issue, because the pattern for any API is terminating with the extension format. .json, .xml, .csv . it is more elegant IMO than x.json.mobi
