Breaking with other versions will be difficult, because they will be using templates tothe application level. With that would not cause any bugs. Perhaps what needs to betested is the automatic update of the framework. _____________________________________________ *Gilson Filho* *Web Developer http://gilsondev.com*
2011/5/2 Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> > It works for me but under the hood there were a few changes. > > We need to make sure that indeed we did not break anything and in > particular we did not break backward compatibility. > > Some people, like Thadeus, have been using subfolders already. I do > not think that should be considered a backward compatibility issue but > I would like to know if other people have been doing that. > > Massimo > > On May 1, 10:13 pm, Gilson Filho <cont...@gilsondev.com> wrote: > > Will need more tests or already is scheduled to play for production? > > _____________________________________________ > > *Gilson Filho* > > *Web Developerhttp://gilsondev.com* > > > > 2011/5/2 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, lets say we have this app: > > > > > models/general.py # this model and all models in root folder is always > > > executed > > > > > models/default/something.py # this model and all on the same folder is > only > > > executed whenhttp://..../app/default/*is requested > > > > > models/default/index/something.py # this model and all on the same > fodler > > > is only executes whenhttp://..../app/default/indexis requested > > > > > models/default/contact/something.py # this model and all on the same > fodler > > > is only executes whenhttp://..../app/default/contactis requested > > > > > Imagine a bigger app with too many tables, too many validators etc. > there > > > are no need to always load models of 'contact' page. > > > > > -- > > > Bruno Rocha > > > [ About me:http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno] > > > > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:50 PM, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >> Am I understanding correctly that we could save memory by not loading > all > > >> models on all page views? That seems like a reasonable objective. >
