It works for me but under the hood there were a few changes. We need to make sure that indeed we did not break anything and in particular we did not break backward compatibility.
Some people, like Thadeus, have been using subfolders already. I do not think that should be considered a backward compatibility issue but I would like to know if other people have been doing that. Massimo On May 1, 10:13 pm, Gilson Filho <cont...@gilsondev.com> wrote: > Will need more tests or already is scheduled to play for production? > _____________________________________________ > *Gilson Filho* > *Web Developerhttp://gilsondev.com* > > 2011/5/2 Bruno Rocha <rochacbr...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > Yes, lets say we have this app: > > > models/general.py # this model and all models in root folder is always > > executed > > > models/default/something.py # this model and all on the same folder is only > > executed whenhttp://..../app/default/*is requested > > > models/default/index/something.py # this model and all on the same fodler > > is only executes whenhttp://..../app/default/indexis requested > > > models/default/contact/something.py # this model and all on the same fodler > > is only executes whenhttp://..../app/default/contactis requested > > > Imagine a bigger app with too many tables, too many validators etc. there > > are no need to always load models of 'contact' page. > > > -- > > Bruno Rocha > > [ About me:http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno] > > > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:50 PM, pbreit <pbreitenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Am I understanding correctly that we could save memory by not loading all > >> models on all page views? That seems like a reasonable objective.
