> I don't think that they'll be any cleaner or shorter either way. The only way > you'll get trailing slashes (if we end up supporting them) is by asking for a > URL with empty trailing args. If you don't want trailing slashes, then don't > add empty args.
Hi, I was mainly thinking of incoming urls being appended with slashes externally and that we could ignore them, but as it has been pointed out, a trailing slash already gives an empty arg, so I suppose we have to keep that. Anyhow, it sounds like your thought process has covered all the bases! :) Thanks. D
