On Oct 22, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Anthony wrote: > > On Oct 22, 9:50 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: >> Thanks Bruno for your hard work. >> >> Although we have to choose one (and it seems to me we have a clear >> winner), I propose we keep some of the alternative ones (I personally >> like 8, 14, 21, 41, 76, 87, 89, 12, 112) and we make them available >> under an Artistic License for web2py related community sites. > > 104 is cool too, and it might be fun to use 37 somewhere as well.
From the point of view of a voting guy (http://prfound.org and http://code.google.com/p/droop/), a quibble: the design with the most votes got 12 of 71 votes, just under 17%. In a normal election, we might question whether 17% of the vote yields a "clear winner". That's why Anthony and I have been harping on the need for a more sophisticated voting method for this kind of contest. My quick and unverified scan of the page turns up 69 votes, btw, not 71. If that's right, there's a bug somewhere. Here's my list: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 7 12
