On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:43 PM, mr.freeze wrote: > Very nice. I think this is more congruous with web2py's philosophy of > ease of use.
It seems clean enough, I think. One thing to keep in mind (I think I've mentioned this somewhere) is that the default_application setting is effective only after rewriting. And with app-specific routing, of course, the other defaults can and should be in the app-specific routes.py, if there is one. > > On Aug 11, 11:12 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote: >> >>> i voted this too. >> >>> I just dont like thecontrollernameddefaultand i want it different >>> on each apps. >> >>> On 8/6/10, mr.freeze <nat...@freezable.com> wrote: >>>> Massimo, why not make thedefaultapplication,controllerand function >>>> configurable in an external file like options.py or >>>> parameters_xxxx.py? >> >> This is now in the trunk. See routes.example.py for documentation >> (there'salso a note in the online book).
