Not another config file, just another config option. Why have the
overhead and complexity of a routes regex when you could just set it
explicitly in an existing config file? Just seems more straightforward
and user friendly to me.
On Aug 6, 12:26 pm, Albert Abril <albert.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @mr.freeze You can do it with routes.py . Why another config file?
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Phyo Arkar <phyo.arkarl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > i voted this too.
>
> > I just dont like the controller named default and i want it different
> > on each apps.
>
> > On 8/6/10, mr.freeze <nat...@freezable.com> wrote:
> > > Massimo, why not make the default application,controller and function
> > > configurable in an external file like options.py or
> > > parameters_xxxx.py?
>
> > > On Aug 6, 9:08 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> > >> No. But you can remap into a different controller using routes.py
>
> > >> routes_in = [
> > >> ('/myapp', '/myapp/non_default/index'),
> > >> ]
>
> > >> On Aug 6, 9:05 am, David Marko <dma...@tiscali.cz> wrote:
>
> > >> > Is there a way how to specifiy, which controller act as default? I
> > >> > mean specify different controller than with name 'default', which name
> > >> > is a bit strange (at least for non-english speaking countries.)
>
> > >> > David
