yes. So I see on this thread 2 or 3 different ideas and a small roadmap: - this web conf (YAML) editor as a first step to create/edit app metadata based on a specification (yet to build). This is a general application which can be applied to any yaml file in different scenarios. - On a second step, the Appliance Remote Manager (it should be called something like web2py app supermarket) - applying this to plugins/slices [?].
So, anyone open to share efforts to make this thing happen? On May 14, 2:13 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > I think I will make a web yaml editor which should be perfect for > > configurating things with a browser... > > I can see many applications for it, for example a way to edit tables. > It would be nice if it were possible to constrain the structure of the > accessible yaml (for example the field types when describing a table). > I would use jsTree. > > On May 14, 8:08 am, blackthorne <francisco....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > that's exactly what I am suggesting. > > speaking about that, I think I will make a web yaml editor which > > should be perfect for configurating things with a browser... > > > On May 14, 2:01 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > There is LICENSE and ABOUT. We can add another file where to keep > > > metadata and make edtable via admin as with ABOUT. > > > > On May 14, 5:14 am, blackthorne <francisco....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Maybe, before going further with this there should be a place in > > > > web2py framework to edit the app details such as the version, > > > > dependencies, app name, which could be included in the app_conf.yml > > > > file [?]. This would make things a lot easier when you want to > > > > retrieve the details of an app or when you want to subscribe it, so > > > > this file will hold everything needed. > > > > > Notice, it will always follow "convention over configuration". If > > > > there is no conf file, version "1.0" could be assumed, the folder name > > > > becomes the "app name". > > > > > Massimo, is there any already existant file to keep this data? is this > > > > a good idea? > > > > > On May 14, 4:26 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > > > > I agree. > > > > > > On May 13, 9:02 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Massimo, we can take the ideas for plugin metadata and use it for > > > > > > applications as well? > > > > > > > Change the name from plugincentral to web2pycentral. We can start an > > > > > > open source version of the web2pycentral and decide who can work on > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Thadeus > > > > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Jason Brower <encomp...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I say we move forward with this one as it doesn't need so much > > > > > > > work as > > > > > > > with the plugins. At least at first thought. It's just > > > > > > > additional > > > > > > > metadata in the application. I think some simple xml/html would > > > > > > > do the > > > > > > > trick. Just what data if for someone else to think about. :D > > > > > > > But I think it's awesome. > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > Jason Brower > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 09:13 -0700, mdipierro wrote: > > > > > > >> This is a good idea. > > > > > > > >> On May 13, 11:09 am, blackthorne <francisco....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >> > ok, this one may be interesting... > > > > > > > >> > Currently, we can install web2py apps in one of 3 ways. > > > > > > >> > uploading it, > > > > > > >> > providing its url or putting the files in the applications > > > > > > >> > folder > > > > > > >> > manually. Nothing wrong with this but seems to me that with > > > > > > >> > little > > > > > > >> > effort we could take this beyond. > > > > > > >> > Think about an integrated (web) interface that allowed you to > > > > > > >> > search > > > > > > >> > or browser appliances and show its details when requested. > > > > > > >> > This could > > > > > > >> > happen inside the web2py framework and you could even install > > > > > > >> > it by > > > > > > >> > pressing a button (actually it just needs to use the already > > > > > > >> > existing > > > > > > >> > "download/provide url" option inside). > > > > > > >> > I think this could improve user/developer experience but > > > > > > >> > that's not > > > > > > >> > all... > > > > > > >> > Applications could have versions, and a changelog that could > > > > > > >> > make part > > > > > > >> > of the details of the application and an "update" option, so > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > >> > users could keep all their apps on the edge. > > > > > > > >> > Who's with me? > > > > > > > >> > Thank you, best regards
