On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Anthony <av201...@yahoo.com> wrote: [...]
> From what I've read, web2py sounds like a great framework -- > comprehensive, well-integrated, easy to set up, learn, and deploy, > etc. However, although it sounds good on paper, I haven't yet found a > single site built with web2py that looks all that impressive (at least > superficially). It's easy to find quite a number of sophisticated and > impressive looking sites/apps built with Ruby on Rails and Django, but > I haven't seen anything remotely comparable based on web2py. I'm > wondering why the disparity. What you've seen on those sites is the façade. It's the work of graphic designers and not a merit of the underlying frameworks. That's what you see. I'm sure the same effect can be achieved with any web2py based website. You just need to hire a great graphic designer and usability expert. -- Alexei Vinidiktov
