Good point. I agree.
On Nov 16, 11:37 pm, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Nov 17, 8:53 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > You do not need apache for the worker nodes. You can but would not but
> > you much.
>
> It would if you also have static files and are trying to serve it via
> same infrastructure. Even Apache would be better at serving static
> files than builtin server. Because nginx can serve static files and
> handle SSL, you may find that nginx front end serving static files and
> load balancing to multiple back end Apache/mod_wsgi may be a better
> solution.
>
> If you are using a separate domain/server infrastructure to serve
> static files, something which I am not sure web2py can easily do for
> contained static files, then it may be a different matter.
>
> Graham
>
> > On Nov 16, 1:59 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
>
> > > Are the web2py instances running on their own apache instance? Or just the
> > > web2py built in server?
>
> > > -Thadeus
>
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > I just tried this and i worked great:
>
> > > >http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/33
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
