On Nov 17, 8:53 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
> You do not need apache for the worker nodes. You can but would not but
> you much.
It would if you also have static files and are trying to serve it via
same infrastructure. Even Apache would be better at serving static
files than builtin server. Because nginx can serve static files and
handle SSL, you may find that nginx front end serving static files and
load balancing to multiple back end Apache/mod_wsgi may be a better
solution.
If you are using a separate domain/server infrastructure to serve
static files, something which I am not sure web2py can easily do for
contained static files, then it may be a different matter.
Graham
> On Nov 16, 1:59 pm, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Are the web2py instances running on their own apache instance? Or just the
> > web2py built in server?
>
> > -Thadeus
>
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > I just tried this and i worked great:
>
> > >http://www.web2pyslices.com/main/slices/take_slice/33
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
