ERRATA I said something wrong. I said I do not know the content of the reviews. That is because I did not scroll the rejection letters to the bottom. The reviews are there and they are actually good.
I do not know if those reviewers are here. If they are, thank you. Talk #1 ======= Reviewer #38: +1 This sounds like a great talk showing how and why web2py is different. ................................................................................ Reviewer #37: +0 I'm quite interested in the details of why web2py is different. I'll be more excited about this talk once the author makes clear that he'll really get into those details -- it would be easy to spend 30 minutes with the basic tutorial stuff and leave us wanting more of the ................................................................................ Reviewer #36: +0 Good for people to see that something other than Django/TG/Pylons exists, and a talk about why they're different is the best way to do that. ................................................................................ Reviewer #39: +0 Discussions of design decisions can be interesting, when done well. ................................................................................ Reviewer #52: +0 I'm not a fan of web2py. Not at all. However, I'm interested in some of the design decisions. Also, perhaps the framework has concepts in it of which I am not aware. Talk #2 ======= Reviewer #18: +1 With the revisions, I think this is good talk material. It's still unclear whether the Semantic Web is going to catch on, but a significant number of web thinkers are interested in it, and having it well-addressed by Python can be one more part of showing the world that we are a Deadly Bloody Serious language. ................................................................................ Reviewer #39: +0 I agree, with the revisions this sounds much more generally applicable. ................................................................................ Reviewer #35: -0 Good proposal, interesting subject. However I think the semantic web is pretty much vapor and theory right now, so I don't know how big of an audience this would draw. I would be +0 with added commentary to implementation in other frameworks. ................................................................................ Reviewer #33: +0 I'd attend this talk. ................................................................................ Reviewer #66: +1 How to expose your data to the semantic web - I like this topic, and talk. There is a demo app included, and I think it should encourage others to follow suit. It would be nice to encourage all other frameworks to follow suite, so that we can have a python RDF service to run accross framworks (a worthy 2011 talk). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
