They do not, but I am familiar with the process since I participated in reviewing other talks.
There is a committee, and I am in it. Members of the committee are blind to their own talk proposals so I could see reviews about mine, only the names of the reviewers. People vote +1, +0, -0, -1. Than the committee usually groups talks by all +1, all +, all -, etc. and vote on them. web2py talks passed a first review but not the second. I know the problem with this approach. It takes only one member of the committee with voting one -1 to kill a talk. As a policy I abstained from giving negative votes to any Django related talk. I do not know the votes for web2py talks but I know who voted. Interestingly I checked them out. 4 of 5 of the people who reviewed my talk were registered DjangoPeople. Since can not see their votes it is very well possible they did give the talks positive reviews. I just do not know. Massimo On Nov 4, 8:55 am, Hipertracker <hipertrac...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 4, 4:23 am, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > > I am sorry to inform you that both the talks I proposed to PyCon 2010 > > about web2py have been rejected. > > This is the third year all web2py related talks have been rejected. > > I do not have any additional information about this. > > Did they explain why? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
