I have the same problem! :-(

On 24 out, 16:08, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> wrote:
> My only complaint about the web editor is it is buggy. Every once in a while
> (like every 5 minutes) it will bug up, and not display the code correctly,
> hard to explain so heres a screenshot
>
> http://static.thadeusb.com/web2py_web_editor.png
>
> I would use the web editor more often if that wouldn't happen.
>
> -Thadeus
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Doxaliber <salingro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Carlo,
>
> > I must say that another thing I don't like about web2py is the web
> > editor and the web shell... :-) Yes, after all we can consider those
> > features a pros and fortunately we can still edit our web2py apps
> > using our preferred editor. Probably in the future, also for me, it
> > will be an advantage to edit my webapp via browser, but I really love
> > VI editor and, for now, I will continue to edit my apps using it! :-)
> > About console I think that web2py console  is similar to the Django
> > one. You can call django console with: python manage.py shell.
>
> > On 24 Ott, 16:15, carlo <syseng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > about your ORM remarks, Massimo already pointed out this: I prefer a
> > > more powerful tool but maybe (little) less immediate than the other
> > > way round, but I think that this is ultimately just a matter of
> > > taste.
>
> > > I am not a Django expert but I used it in the past: what really got me
> > > to adopt web2py was his template language, the more pythonic I have
> > > ever seen and that's really a thing you will appreciate.
>
> > > About docs, you are right but web2py is improving..about admin, I do
> > > not have a deep practice with Django administration, but I have to say
> > > I never had the feeling that web2py lack something important in his
> > > admin interface. I would add that the admin web2py console where you
> > > can test your query from the command line is also a great thing you
> > > should try.
>
> > > carlo
>
> > > On 23 Ott, 20:27, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > > > authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author)
>
> > > > This hides the actual database implementation. It is fine is the link
> > > > table does not carry additional information but limiting otherwise.
> > > > Web2py we choose not abstract the databse too much, only the syntax to
> > > > access it, more like RoR does it.
> > > > We allow complex joins in the queries which (in my opinion)
> > > > compensates for the lack of a syntax like the one you propose).
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to