On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>wrote: > >> On Aug 15, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: >> >> BTW - I am still VERY STRONGLY for using the same font on all these >> logos; let's address that. >> >> >> Yes. >> >> I'm not a fan of leaving out the non-stylized W; it's going to be >> confusing, and it won't work when 'web2py' is underneath the symbol. Also, >> the symbol isn't that obvious a W; it doesn't hurt to repeat it. >> > > I think leaving it out for an optional logo is fine (I think it looks good, > and I think we also need a logo w/ the normal font "w"). > > > The issue is consistency of image and message. If there's a compelling > reason to add yet another version (say, long and horizontal vs square), then > fine. But variation for the sake of variation detracts from having a > consistent graphic identity. > I personally don't think this is inconsistent... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
