I think my logic was that limiting to 20 would increase the likelyhood of people remembering their password, thus reducing the number of passwords sent in email. Probably not a realistic assumption though. I have no issue with changing it.
On Aug 11, 6:30 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2009, at 4:24 PM, mdipierro wrote: > > > > > Getting rid would not be backward compatible but we can change it to > > 32, the default length for a string field. We can even change it to a > > larger number. I do not have a strong opinion about this since it > > eventually gets hashed anyway. > > How about defaulting it to 0? > > > > > > > On Aug 11, 6:18 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> It seems strange that IS_STRONG() should impose a max length on a > >> field, when by default there is no max length. Seems like max= > >> belongs > >> in IS_WEAK(), not IS_STRONG(). > > >> (And the new manual doesn't mention max=.) > > >> How about just getting rid of max= ?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
