Getting rid would not be backward compatible but we can change it to 32, the default length for a string field. We can even change it to a larger number. I do not have a strong opinion about this since it eventually gets hashed anyway.
On Aug 11, 6:18 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > It seems strange that IS_STRONG() should impose a max length on a > field, when by default there is no max length. Seems like max= belongs > in IS_WEAK(), not IS_STRONG(). > > (And the new manual doesn't mention max=.) > > How about just getting rid of max= ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
