I will take a patch for this. Massimo
On Aug 7, 1:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 2009, at 9:32 PM, DenesL wrote: > > > IS_EMAIL does not follow the RFC specs for valid email addresses > > (seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address) > > > even a simple a...@b.com fails > > > it is kinda late to work on the regex now, maybe tomorrow. > > The RFC is fairly hard to validate. If that's what we really want, I > found this one on the web that looks about right: > > ^(?!\.)("([^"\r\\]|\\["\r\\])*"|([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?...@[a- > z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$ > > It assumes the case-insensitive flag. > > http://haacked.com/archive/2007/08/21/i-knew-how-to-validate-an-email... > > Overkill? Or, what the heck? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
