This is a good point but I disagree and agree.

I disagree because I do not think we ever wrote messy code because we
needed to keep backward compatibility. So far we never had to
compromise much. Moreover backward compatibility is a strength of
web2py.

I agree because one day all existing database divers will be ported to
Python 3.0 and GAE will support python 3.0. When this happen (in 2-3
years) we may want to release a backward incompatible version of
web2py (while keeping support for the old one). That would be the time
to change a few other things and that will be the time to discuss what
to change.

Massimo




On Aug 4, 12:55 pm, Alex Fanjul <alex.fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Massimo,
> Many times I have seen that, due to backward compatibility, we are
> forcing to write "messy" code in web2py applitacations.
> Evenmore some issues will never fix in the right way bacause of that...
> Won't you consider/planning to do a breakpoint with a major version
> web2py 2.0?  and solve such things?
>
> Python did it with 3.0, isn't it?
>
> Only out of curiosity, sorry if it's reduplicate question, regards,
> Alex F
>
> El 04/08/2009 9:04, mdipierro escribió:
>
>
>
> > Changing now into utcnow would break backward compatibility.
>
> > I do agree with you that othen people may want to use
>
> >     Field(....,default=datetime.utcnow())
>
> > instead of
>
> >     Field(....,default=request.now)
>
> > I will add a comment about this in the book.
>
> > Massimo
>
> > On Aug 3, 3:22 am, Armin Ronacher<armin.ronac...@active-4.com>  wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >>> True. but I would not call it a race condition. We timestamp
> >>> everything with the time when a request arrives, not when it is
> >>> processed, unless specified otherwise (datetime.now() instead of
> >>> request.now)
>
> >> True.  But that does not make it a better idea.  Also, datetime.now()
> >> should be consistently replaced with datetime.utcnow() because using
> >> anythign else than UTC data internally is problematic for various
> >> reasons.  See the discussion on that topic in various i18n/l10n
> >> libraries such as babel / pytz.
>
> >>> True but I believe we never do that in web2py. It is also true that
> >>> nothing prevent the user from doing it but the same would be true with
> >>> other frameworks.
>
> >> You're not doing it, a user might be doing that by accident or because
> >> he things it should work.  This problem does not exist in other
> >> frameworks because besides web2py I don't know a single one that does
> >> this sort of execfile() + namespace thing or uses any other kind of
> >> throwaway modules.  As soon as a single reference leaks from the
> >> execfile()'d namespace you're in big troubles and due to the open
> >> nature of Python this could happen very, very fast.
>
> >>> Yes but because all relevant application code is executed within a
> >>> context and there are no references outside the context to stuff
> >>> inside the context, when a request is completed, the context is
> >>> deleted and everything should be garbage collected.
>
> >> That depends on two things.  First not having a reference leaked,
> >> which could happen with abstract base classes and other stuff that
> >> uses registries or steals non-weak references.  Also and more
> >> importantly, the file descriptor limit is very low and the majority of
> >> Python implementations will only collect that on the GC run (always,
> >> no matter where references are).  Say you're opening three files per
> >> request and you have more than 100 requests/sec you could lose all
> >> file descriptors that are available before the GC even thought about
> >> running.
>
> >> Regards,
> >> Armin
>
> --
> Alejandro Fanjul Fdez.
> alex.fan...@gmail.comwww.mhproject.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to