Thanks guys, So those books about Python 3.0, it's useless if I am planning to learn Web2py Python's version. Because they say: "
Python 3 is the best version of the language yet: It is more powerful, convenient, consistent, and expressive than ever before. Now, leading Python programmer Mark Summerfield demonstrates how to write code that takes full advantage of Python 3’s features and idioms. The first book written from a completely “Python 3” viewpoint, *Programming in Python 3 *brings together all the knowledge you need to write any program, use any standard or third-party Python 3 library, and create new library modules of your own. - Developing in Python using procedural, object-oriented, and functional programming paradigms - Creating custom packages and modules - Writing and reading binary, text, and XML files, including optional compression, random access, and text and XML parsing - Leveraging advanced data types, collections, control structures, and functions - Spreading program workloads across multiple processes and threads - Programming SQL databases and key-value DBM files - Utilizing Python’s regular expression mini-language and module - Building usable, efficient, GUI-based applications - Advanced programming techniques, including generators, function and class decorators, context managers, descriptors, abstract base classes, metaclasses, and more " On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Python 3 requires some code changes to applications. While these are not > really great, the deal is (it seems always with major Python release > changes) that it's easier to migrate an app than a framework - as (for > example) web2py and django use mod_wsgi, all sorts of db backends, > libraries, etc. When all those port and are stable and available, then the > applications that use the various libraries from the Python community > usually follow suite. > > Consider it will take something on the order of a year or so. > > BTW - the web2py code base itself is poised to run on Python 3, but until > those other things are there (and tested) it wouldn't be terribly useful. > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:28 PM, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Oh I was wondering why Web2py and Django are not using the last >> version of Python 3 as well. >> Thanks. >> >> On Jul 9, 9:11 pm, eric cs <eeri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hey guys, >> > >> > I am a newbie and Python and amazed by Web2py so I was wondering.... >> > Can you compared them for me? As far as best features, closures,mixins >> > and etc? >> > Which one is easier to a newbie learn and why? >> > I do know they look like each other but I saw some people saying >> > Python is more mature than Ruby. >> > Although Python and it's frameworks has much less books than Ruby and >> > Rails. >> > Some people like that because leaves Python on the >> > underground...hackers...heheh >> > Thanks. >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
