Well, it's not a distribution... the various executables and tarballs are distribution.
A clean clone today is out of whack to be called a distribution. Here's tonight's clean checkout: size (I skip all the relatively uninteresting stuff): [yak...@thynken web2py]$ du -h clean* .... 396K clean-clone/doc/source 632K clean-clone/doc .... 1.3M clean-clone/gluon/contrib 2.6M clean-clone/gluon .... 1.9M clean-clone/applications/admin .... 780K clean-clone/applications/examples ... 380K clean-clone/applications/spreadsheet ... 300K clean-clone/applications/welcome 3.3M clean-clone/applications 48K clean-clone/scripts 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/checkout/lock 152K clean-clone/.bzr/checkout 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/repository/lock 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/repository/obsolete_packs 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/repository/upload 4.6M clean-clone/.bzr/repository/indices 481M clean-clone/.bzr/repository/packs 486M clean-clone/.bzr/repository 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/branch/lock 20K clean-clone/.bzr/branch 4.0K clean-clone/.bzr/branch-lock 486M clean-clone/.bzr 495M clean-clone 16K clean-clone.examples.patch [yak...@thynken web2py]$ How is it that "welcome" has become 380K? Static (144K) and views (44k). But that 481MB (.bzr/repository/packs) is in ONE FILE. One good result of Hans' general suggestion is that the release will have far fewer revisions in it's "packs", and thus be a better candidate for otehrs to checkout and get started contributing from. (We should think thru how we would use the repositories, see how other porjects have them setup). On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Hans Donner <hans.don...@pobox.com> wrote: > > the is now also acting as a kind of distribution. We might need to > split that and have > - source develop > - source stable > - distribution dev > - distribution stable > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Yarko Tymciurak<yark...@gmail.com> wrote: > > oh - I just checked, and I was running web2py 1.65.0 on Firefox 3.5 on > > Fedora-11 / 64; > > > > I grabbed a clean clone of web2py 1.65.1, and repeated - also worked fine > > > > (NOTE: we need to think about the repository: it took forever to get a > > branch - the .bzr directory is now at 486MB, mostrly from the one pack (I > > presume holding revisions).... Are we keeping the tar files in there > too? > > That would make this H U G E... > > > > We should think about cleaning it up. In essence, the *.w2p files are > > derived files, and as such (like the *.pyc files) should not be under > > version control. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Yarko Tymciurak <yark...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I just copy / pasted the link below into the URL of the admin page and > it > >> installed as "testme" just fine with latest web2py. > >> > >> Can you give more information? > >> > >> Are you downloading the app first, then installing it from local disk? > >> Are you installing from the url? > >> What O/S? What browser / version? > >> Which web2py version (source or compiled)? > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Francois (Jersey) > >> <francois.ches...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Try to install from the following link > >>> > >>> > http://www.web2py.com/appliances/default/download/app.source.abebe92ece83f899.73686565742e773270.w2p > , > >>> and I still have an error message, Unable to install application > >>> "spreadsheet". > >>> > >>> Am I the only one in this case? > >>> > >>> Francois > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
