Dominic, it seems you are responding to a discussion that is happening 
elsewhere rather than this discussion.
 

> I have been pushed to explain the use case and finally the discussion was 
> about this use case and the question became this use case.
>

You provided the use case in your original post. I have requested that you 
provide some further details regarding setup, update process, etc., and 
suggested it would be helpful for you to detail a workflow (perhaps based 
on what you have seen with PHP frameworks), but those requests were with 
regard to your interest in a wrapper application. The reason is there are 
different ways of thinking about and implementing a "wrapper," and the best 
approach depends on the context. For example, the wrapper could be a shell 
application, and the application developer could provide an application 
that simply unzips on top of that (or could provide a set of web2py plugins 
to serve as the application), but the applicability of that approach would 
depend on the setup, business rules, and update mechanism.
 

> Perhaps, the rule here is that a question should be how to address a 
> practical use case with no attach to a particular approach.
>

No, there is no rule, but if you are looking for a specific solution, you 
must specify the problem in sufficient detail. Just saying "wrapper 
application" is too vague.
 

> There was some suggestions here that the use of wrapper applications is 
> not a different approach.
>

And where have you seen this suggestion?
 

> I have been talking about the value of the  concept of wrapper application 
> to pass the config file location, but it was not my intention at all to 
> discuss that. I just wanted to know if it is possible to do this in web2py 
> as we can in PHP [without an extra HTTP request].   I do not complain. I 
> appreciate very much what we discuss and I am sure we will find a way to 
> wrap an application in web2py without an extra HTTP request. It just did 
> not happen, because we did not focus on this and instead tried to argue 
> that it is not interesting.
>

But it did happen, in the second sentence of this entire discussion.

Anthony 

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to