On Monday, 20 June 2016 18:59:58 UTC-4, Anthony wrote: > > On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 3:24:46 PM UTC-4, Dominic Mayers wrote: >> >> Anthony, I am going to reply to one specific part of your last post, the >> one with "I don't think the concept of wrapper application is well >> defined.": >> >> I don't think the concept of "wrapper application" is well defined. In >> any case, we should probably drop that idea, as your ultimate goal is not >> to have a "wrapper application" but instead to have some configuration data >> made available to your application -- so let's focus on that. >> >> I should not be here to defend the usefulness of a wrapper application or >> even rigorously define it. >> > > You were not asked to defend the usefulness of a wrapper application. >
I did not meant that I felt it was negative. I am new here. I have no intention to be negative or fight. I was just trying to explain why I deviated from my original question, but I agree that I went along. I even said that I do not complain. I will take the time to read the remainder of your post. -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
