Meteor probably got funding because (a) they have an impressive team with an established track record, (b) they are building the next generation web framework, and (c) they have a business plan for making money (i.e., enterprise add-on products and support).
Interestingly, in the Node.js world, Meteor receives some of the same criticisms that have been leveled at web2py (i.e., too much magic; too monolithic; not relying on or playing well with the existing ecosystem; violating community norms/standards). Yet these are the reasons that many people love it -- because it is beginner friendly and makes development much faster and easier than was previously possible. Anthony On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 6:15:04 AM UTC-5, Ramos wrote: > > Funding web2py could punch it to the future faster > > Meteor did it , why cant web2py get some fundings ? > > > https://www.meteor.com/blog/2012/07/25/meteors-new-112-million-development-budget > > Regards > António > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
