weheh,

Hmmm. Out of the box to handle something like YouTube? Maybe. Before
YouTube was bought out by Google they were a huge MySQL shop. One of
the tricks they utilized was the FEDERATED keyword that's not in the
DAL. That gave them cross server-DB access. Using executesql might be
able to do it? YouTube now is using Google's map-reduce architecture &
BigTable. With GAE available for Web2Py you could do it. Like
anything, what the client environment is mandates your available
solutions.

Personally I think the portability of the DAL to utilize all the major
DB's will be a critical part of its success.

On Jun 5, 3:09 am, weheh <richard_gor...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Why wouldn't a web2py serve to handle a website on the order of
> youTube? Why couldn't an IBM handle their corporate intranet as well
> as their extranet with web2py? Is web2py missing something in
> particular? Is it missing something critical that can't be built?
>
> For sure, it is the only framework that I've researched that allows 1
> person to do it all. Extraordinary software is more the hallmark of
> small teams than behemoths. This is why I think web2py is will enable
> work of integrity, consistency and performance. And python puts vast
> functionality within the reach of many.
>
> Enterprise is defined as "a project undertaken or to be undertaken,
> esp. one that is important or difficult or that requires boldness or
> energy." It isn't easy, but one person can change the world. Web2py
> makes it substantially easier for that one person.
>
> On Jun 3, 10:33 pm, Eric Florenzano <flo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 1) Don't worry about whether Web2Py is 'Enterprise Ready'. That is
> > > Tech Press/Vendor Spiel to create marketshare with appeal. Its verbal
> > > junk. Go take a look at table 2a 
> > > --http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/smallbus.html
> > > . The tally of firms <100 employees to those >100 outrank them 10x.
>
> > You're very right, there are many more small businesses than large
> > ones.
>
> > > The number of firms with budgets that support $1m+ software projects
> > > is less than 20k. There are probably 100 'Enterprise Providers' (eg
> > > Microsoft, IBM, Sun, Oracle) chasing that small field.  So when I hear
> > > a programmer state they do 'Enterprise level production development'
> > > like some badge, Django or otherwise they too are chasing that small
> > > field of money. Most likely as a member of one of those 'Enterprise
> > > Providers'.
>
> > Again, I couldn't agree more--people who say they are doing
> > 'Enterprise level production development' are usually part of
> > Microsoft, IBM, Sun, Oracle, or are working for a large company using
> > primarily those products.  I usually find that term to be more fluff
> > than anything else.  There are a few components to 'Enterprise level
> > production development' that are truly unique, like OLAP/OLTP that
> > don't tend to happen in other domains, but most of the time people
> > aren't talking about that.
>
> > > 2) The opportunity is in that <100 employee range. Those firms rarely
> > > have million dollar budgets. Nor do they typically have the budgets to
> > > buy WebSphere platforms or SAP software. But their need is just as
> > > great for specialized software.
>
> > > Better to cater to the smaller firms who would benefit from web2py. It
> > > is just as important to be able to be profitable in the small scale as
> > > the large. Fact more so.
>
> > Definitely!  It seems that Web2Py is highly optimized for this type of
> > situation.  Small team, rapid prototyping, teaching, etc.  I think
> > it's a really under-appreciated niche, too.
>
> > Thanks,
> > Eric Florenzano
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to