> Perhaps, but if they're not interested (or can contribute more value to > the framework in some other way), that may just leave you. If you're not > interested, why should anyone else be? > > Because other people are different than me. :) They might like this sort of thing.
> For further reading, see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage. > > Pffff.... Don't even get me started with Adam-Smith's BS.... I liked this quote: "...comparative advantage is a metaphysical assumption, rather than a discovery..." I will only gain better advantage learning thing in order to change them, if the amount of effort I would invest in the practice of learning, would be negated by the value I gain from "consecutive" changes I later make. It "pre-assumes" that there would be such changes... Long-term investment are only profitable in "iterative" occurrences, in which each consecutive occurrence gains more benefit, reducing the overall impact of the up-front investment. In case of a one-off action one needs to take, the invested-effort becomes unprofitable. In short, for people who are/plan-to-be "contributors" for an open-source project (such as yourself), you are absolutely right. As for the rest of us, though... -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
