It is correct in the sense it is what I intended it to be. You are 
proposing a change of behavior. I see where you are coming from. Please 
open a ticket about this.

I would like to have some more opinions about this. Should None in 
is_active be treated as True?


On Friday, 21 December 2012 14:02:25 UTC-6, Cliff Kachinske wrote:
>
> SQL is incorrect.  
>
> is:  "AND supplier_contacts.is_active = 'T'"
> should be "AND (supplier_contacts.is_active = 'T' OR 
> supplier_contacts.is_active IS NULL)"
>
> On Friday, December 21, 2012 1:05:16 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>
>> It looks to be the generated SQL is correct. It is possible you enabled 
>> record versioning and that added the common_filter is_active==True. Yet 
>> perhaps you have records with is_active=None and therefore they showed up 
>> before and not now.
>>
>> On Friday, 21 December 2012 10:50:13 UTC-6, Cliff Kachinske wrote:
>>>
>>> Salient details from two tables:
>>>
>>> db.define_table(
>>>     'suppliers',
>>>     Field('name', length=256, required=True, notnull=True),
>>>     ....
>>>
>>>
>>> db.define_table(
>>>     'supplier_contacts',
>>>     Field('supplier_id', db.suppliers),
>>>     Field('first_name', length=32, required=True, notnull=True),
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The code below worked in 1.99.7.  If the supplier had two contacts, it 
>>> would return two rows as expected, both with the same supplier data but 
>>> each with individual contact data.  
>>>
>>> In 2.2.1 it returns no rows.
>>>
>>> def get_approved_suppliers(product_id):
>>>
>>> return db(
>>>             (db.product_suppliers.product_id==product_id) &
>>>             (db.product_suppliers.supplier_id==db.suppliers.id)
>>>             ).select(
>>>                     db.suppliers.id,
>>>                     db.suppliers.name,
>>>                     # more supplier details omitted for brevity,
>>>                     db.supplier_contacts.id,
>>>                     db.supplier_contacts.first_name,
>>>                     # contact details omitted for brevity.
>>>                     left = db.supplier_contacts.on(
>>>                         db.supplier_contacts.supplier_id==db.suppliers.
>>> id
>>>                         )
>>>                     )
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the query as shown by db._lastsql.  (Broken into chunks for 
>>> readability)
>>>
>>> SELECT  suppliers.id, suppliers.name, suppliers.address, suppliers.
>>> address_2, suppliers.city, suppliers.state, suppliers.zip, suppliers.
>>> land_line, suppliers.fax, suppliers.email, 
>>> suppliers.website,supplier_contacts
>>> .id, supplier_contacts.first_name, 
>>> supplier_contacts.middle_name,supplier_contacts
>>> .last_name, supplier_contacts.generation, 
>>> supplier_contacts.email,supplier_contacts
>>> .mobile, supplier_contacts.land_line, supplier_contacts.fax 
>>>
>>> FROM product_suppliers, suppliers 
>>>
>>> LEFT JOIN supplier_contacts ON (supplier_contacts.supplier_id =suppliers
>>> .id) 
>>>
>>> WHERE (((((product_suppliers.product_id = 340) AND 
>>> (product_suppliers.supplier_id 
>>> = suppliers.id)) AND (product_suppliers.is_active = 'T')) AND (suppliers
>>> .is_active = 'T')) AND (supplier_contacts.is_active = 'T'));
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 



Reply via email to